Case 1400172/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Shaw v Costa Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400172/2024
- Decision date
- 17 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss L Shaw's claim against Costa Limited. The supplied listing category identifies the claim as unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself describes it only as "the claim".
The Tribunal had sent a letter dated 5 November 2024 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 24 July 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 20 January 2025 was cancelled. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was struck out. The supplied listing category identifies the claim as Unfair Dismissal; the judgment text itself does not restate the claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.