Case 1400177/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Everitt v Kirkee Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400177/2024
- Decision date
- 20 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beever Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Everitt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter a hearing on 2, 3 and 4 September 2024, Employment Judge Beever dismissed Mr T Everitt’s unfair dismissal claim brought contrary to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, finding that it was not well founded. The tribunal also dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim, describing that claim as not well founded.
The judgment records no compensatory or other monetary award in favour of the claimant. It also records that the respondent’s application for costs was refused. Oral reasons were given on 4 September 2024, and the written judgment was sent to the parties on 20 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought contrary to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal held it was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Held not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.