Case 1400178/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Janet Dibble v Mr Carlo Melchior — 2026
- Case reference
- 1400178/2025
- Decision date
- 6 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Janet Dibble
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent issued by Employment Judge Bax following a hearing at Bristol (by CVP) on 6 February 2026. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for notice pay, a redundancy payment and holiday pay were each well founded, and ordered the respondent to pay the corresponding sums.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,672.24 for notice pay, £9,180.60 as a redundancy payment, and £1,323.54 gross in respect of holiday pay. The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was recorded as £14,176.38.
The judgment does not set out detailed factual findings, legal reasoning or any contested issues, as it was entered by consent of the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim found well founded by consent. | Upheld | — | £3,672 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment claim found well founded by consent. | Upheld | — | £9,181 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim found well founded by consent; figure stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £1,324 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,176
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.