Case 1400187/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Asmaa Farah v Highlands Care Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400187/2025
- Decision date
- 23 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray-Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Asmaa Farah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in Case No. 1400187/2025, heard at Bristol by CVP on 23 October 2025 before Employment Judge Gray-Jones. The judgment records the parties as represented by Fiona Almadezi for the Claimant and Sarah Samuels for the Respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the complaint of direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. No merits findings are set out on that complaint, and the judgment does not record any award.
The judgment also states that the other complaints pursued in the claim would proceed. No further claims were finally determined in the text provided, and no remedy was assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The remaining complaints in the claim were to proceed and were not determined in this judgment. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.