Case 1400196/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Coleman v Geyer Electronics UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400196/2019
- Decision date
- 9 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Coleman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that terms of settlement had been reached between Mr G Coleman and Geyer Electronics UK Limited. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal stayed the proceedings for 28 days to allow payment of the agreed sum to be made to the claimant.
The tribunal also stated that if it received no communication from the parties by 9 March 2020, the proceedings would be treated as withdrawn and dismissed. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the pleaded claims in this judgment, and no separate remedy figures were set out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been reached and stayed the proceedings for 28 days for payment of the agreed sum. No substantive determination of the claim was made in this judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been reached and stayed the proceedings for 28 days for payment of the agreed sum. No substantive determination of the claim was made in this judgment. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.