Case 1400199/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Croset v Kapaga Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400199/2022
- Decision date
- 7 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Youngs Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Croset
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol Employment Tribunal video hearing on 4 November 2022, before Employment Judge Youngs, Mrs G Croset pursued claims against Kapaga Ltd for unlawful deductions from wages, breach of contract, and holiday pay. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by its director, Mr P Drysdale.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £301.50. It dismissed the breach of contract claim.
The holiday pay claim was also dismissed because the tribunal found that, following termination of employment, the Claimant had received a payment in lieu of all untaken accrued annual leave. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were issued unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £302 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because the tribunal found the Claimant had already received, after termination, a payment in lieu of all untaken accrued annual leave. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £302
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.