Case 1400202/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. Worth v M Worth Autos Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400202/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lang Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. Worth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr P. Worth was dismissed by M Worth Autos Limited by reason of redundancy on 30 September 2021. On that basis, the tribunal held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The award was calculated at £7,350. The tribunal recorded a weekly pay of £350, that Mr Worth was 53 years old at the date of dismissal, and that he had completed 15 years' service, from 3 March 2006 to 30 September 2021.
Mr Worth's claims for notice pay and arrears of pay were withdrawn and therefore dismissed. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 30 September 2021 and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. The award was calculated using weekly pay of £350, age 53, and 15 years' service from 3 March 2006 to 30 September 2021. | Upheld | — | £7,350 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's notice pay claim was withdrawn and therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's arrears of pay claim was withdrawn and therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.