Case 1400215/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dochniak v Cambria Automobiles (South East) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400215/2022
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dochniak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a judgment by consent, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for a shortfall in redundancy payment was well founded. Cambria Automobiles (South East) Limited was ordered to pay £172.24 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claim for a shortfall in payment for accrued but untaken holiday was well founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,043.23.
The claim in respect of a shortfall in notice pay was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal. The hearing took place at Bristol by video hearing on 9 December 2022 before Employment Judge Bax, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 15 December 2022.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claim for a shortfall in the claimant's redundancy payment was well founded. | Upheld | — | £172 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim for a shortfall in payment for accrued but untaken holiday was well founded, and the amount was stated as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,043 |
| Breach of contract | The claim in respect of a shortfall in notice pay was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,215
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.