Case 1400230/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Jarek Wyprzal v Akoom Technologies Limited Heard: By CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400230/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Winfield REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jarek Wyprzal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant, Jarek Wyprzal, succeeded in his complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction in the period 1 December to 8 December 2023 inclusive. The tribunal accepted a gross daily rate of pay of £115.38 and found that six days' wages were due, producing an award of £692.28 gross, with tax or National Insurance payable by the claimant.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. The tribunal found 11.91 days accrued but not taken, rounded this to 12 days, and calculated the gross sum due at £1,384.56 using the same daily rate of £115.38. The claimant was again held responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the payment.
The total amount awarded was £2,076.84 gross. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no further written reasons were provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 December to 8 December 2023 inclusive. It accepted the claimant's gross daily pay as £115.38 and awarded six days' wages. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded because the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. It found 11.91 days accrued but not taken and awarded 12 days at £115.38 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,077
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.