Case 1400237/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Amy Whitford v All Care (GB) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400237/2024
- Decision date
- 1 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Amy Whitford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Plymouth by video on 11 and 12 September 2024 before Employment Judge C H O’Rourke. The claimant, Mrs Amy Whitford, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a tribunal advocate.
The judgment states that the claimant’s claims of constructive unfair dismissal, breach of contract in respect of pay in lieu of notice, unlawful deduction from wages, and arrears of holiday pay all failed and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded.
The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No further factual findings or legal reasoning are set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records a claim of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of pay in lieu of notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for arrears of holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.