Case 1400245/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Drew Robinson v AND KATTA + Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400245/2024
- Decision date
- 21 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Drew Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment issued by Employment Judge N J Roper sitting in chambers at Plymouth on 7 October 2024, following the respondent's failure to present a valid response within the prescribed time. The tribunal therefore determined the claims without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found each of the claimant's three claims to be well founded. The breach of contract claim resulted in an order that the respondent pay one month's notice pay in the net sum of £2,583.33. The unlawful deduction from wages claim resulted in an order for 6 days' pay in the gross sum of £715.38. The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay resulted in an order for 10 days' pay in the gross sum of £1,192.30.
The original judgment was sent to the parties on 21 October 2024 and an amended judgment was sent on 19 February 2025 by Mr J McCormick. The judgment does not set out detailed factual findings or legal reasoning beyond the Rule 21 determination.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One month's notice pay, net sum. | Upheld | — | £2,583 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 6 days' pay, gross sum. | Upheld | — | £715 |
| Holiday pay | 10 days' accrued but unpaid holiday pay, gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,491
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.