Case 1400254/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Evatt v Duncan Bristow trading as The Sportsman’s Rest Public House — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400254/2023
- Decision date
- 18 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Evatt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 12 January 2023 and was dealt with under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states that the Employment Judge could properly determine the claim, or part of it, on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent, Duncan Bristow trading as The Sportsman's Rest Public House, to pay Mr P Evatt £1,375.62 net.
The judgment does not record any separate split between components of loss or any additional remedy beyond the net sum payable. It was sent to the parties on 18 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,376 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,376
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.