Case 1400288/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bryant v Broughton Transport Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400288/2022
- Decision date
- 17 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley On
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bryant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Midgley on 11 October 2022. The claimant, Mr A Bryant, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Miss A Donhou, Paralegal.
The judgment states that the claimant failed to attend the telephone case management hearing on 11 October 2022 and failed to respond to any correspondence from the respondent’s solicitors. In those circumstances, the tribunal dismissed the claims on the basis that they were not actively pursued by the claimant.
No liability findings on the substance of the claims and no monetary award were recorded in the judgment. The order was sent to the parties on 17 October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the claim type in the body of the text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the claim type in the body of the text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.