Case 1400290/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Robins v Hatless Studios Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400290/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Robins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Exeter Employment Tribunals on 29 January 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,720.65. It further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,625.95. The respondent was also found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, with an award of £586.44.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £7,933.04 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 determination after respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £5,721 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,626 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £586 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,933
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.