Case 1400292/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Marsden v Clarkson Evans Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400292/2021
- Decision date
- 4 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Marsden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 14 April 2021, the Tribunal ordered Mr Marsden to provide information about his disability by 12 May 2021. The respondent told the Tribunal that he had not complied. The Tribunal then ordered compliance by return on 9 June 2021, and on 23 June 2021 reminded him to comply and ordered a reply by 30 June 2021, but he did not reply.
By letter dated 15 July 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 19 July 2021 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 6 August 2021 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was ordered to provide information about his disability, then gives a single strike-out order; it does not set out a separate outcome for each head of claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separate the result between the listed jurisdiction codes. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.