Case 1400292/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Hamble Catering Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400292/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail The
- Venue
- Exeter in Chambers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not enter a Response. Employment Judge Smail determined there was sufficient information to issue judgment on the papers at Exeter in Chambers on 5 March 2025. The Claimant's claims for unpaid wages, accrued but untaken holiday pay, and notice pay were each found to be well-founded.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £972.62 in unpaid wages (net), £206.02 in accrued but untaken holiday pay (net), and £442.08 in notice pay (net), with the Respondent additionally liable for any tax and national insurance on those sums. The total sum payable within 14 days is £1,620.72.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages claim found well-founded; awarded net of tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £973 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay found well-founded; awarded net. | Upheld | — | £206 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim found well-founded; awarded net. | Upheld | — | £442 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,621
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.