Case 1400307/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Andrew Thompson v Hanson Quarry Product Europe Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400307/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Andrew Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 23 February 2022 was listed as a preliminary issue before Employment Judge Midgley sitting by video. The tribunal held that Mr Andrew Thompson was disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 between 3 August 2020 and 16 October 2020.
The disability finding was based on the conditions of Superventricular Tachycardia and Ischemic Heart Disease. The record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the extracted text does not contain further findings, analysis, or any remedy determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 between 3 August 2020 and 16 October 2020, by reason of Superventricular Tachycardia and Ischemic Heart Disease. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 EQA 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.