Case 1400314/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Arjay Calpo Barcarse Respondent 1: The Samurai Kitchen Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 2: Sore De Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 3: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Ms Whalley — 2026
- Case reference
- 1400314/2025
- Decision date
- 7 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sanger REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Arjay Calpo Barcarse Respondent 1: The Samurai Kitchen Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 2: Sore De Ltd (in liquidation) Respondent 3: The Secretary of State for Business and Trade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that there had been a transfer of an undertaking from the first respondent to the second respondent under regulation 3 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 on or before 30 October 2024. It also recorded that, under regulation 4(3), the claimant would have been dismissed but for regulation 7(1), and that liabilities under the contract of employment therefore passed from the first respondent to the second respondent.
On the wage claim, the tribunal held that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period from 16 July 2024 to 2 September 2024. It found the complaint well-founded and ordered the second respondent to pay the claimant £1,814.81 gross.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal held that the complaint of breach of contract was well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £264.66 gross as damages for breach of contract. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period from 16 July 2024 to 2 September 2024 and ordered the second respondent to pay £1,814.81 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,815 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay to be well-founded and ordered payment of £264.66 gross as damages. | Upheld | — | £265 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,079
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.