Case 1400315/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Carroll v Cape Industrial Services Ltd Heard by Cloud Video — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400315/2019
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Carroll
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 18 to 20 January 2021 before Employment Judge Reed, the tribunal upheld the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the respondent, Cape Industrial Services Ltd, made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that, upon those declarations and terms of settlement having been agreed, determination of remedy was adjourned by consent. It stated that unless either party applied within 28 days to restore the matter, the claims would be treated for all purposes and without further order as dismissed on withdrawal. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal declared that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.