Case 1400317/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400317/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr D.
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 13 January 2020 before Employment Judge David Harris sitting alone. The Respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the Tribunal considered the materials before it about the Respondent’s absence, including medical and solicitor correspondence, and dismissed the Respondent’s application for a postponement because insufficient grounds for a further postponement had been shown. The Tribunal also heard evidence under affirmation from the Claimant and read the Respondent’s Notice of Response dated 28 February 2019.
The Tribunal amended the Respondent’s name to Mrs B.J. Joss, trading as Aladdin Cleaning Services, and made two monetary awards. First, it ordered payment of £1,029.84 net as one month’s notice pay due to the Claimant following the Respondent’s termination, without notice, of his contract of employment on 30 November 2018. Second, it ordered payment of £620.13 net representing an unlawful deduction from the Claimant’s wages for November 2018.
The total sum ordered was £1,649.97, payable within 14 days of receipt of the judgment. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded for an unlawful deduction from wages for the month of November 2018. | Upheld | — | £620 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as one month’s notice pay due on the Respondent’s termination, without notice, of the Claimant’s contract of employment on 30 November 2018. | Upheld | — | £1,030 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.