Case 1400329/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Levitt by VHS v Levitt Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400329/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyce Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Levitt by VHS
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Carly Levitt, appeared by VHS and the respondent did not attend. Employment Judge Boyce heard the case at Bristol on 16 August 2023 and gave full oral reasons at the hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages, finding that it had been presented out of time. It also dismissed the claim for notice pay, again because it was presented out of time. No substantive determination on liability is recorded for those claims beyond the time bar.
The tribunal similarly dismissed the claims for holiday pay and redundancy pay on limitation grounds. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy, and no part of the claim succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay dismissed because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.