Case 1400336/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kinsley v Fiesta Flowers and Gifts Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400336/2020
- Decision date
- 8 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kinsley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public telephone hearing on 8 April 2020 before Employment Judge Livesey, Mr D Kinsley appeared in person and Fiesta Flowers and Gifts Ltd did not attend. The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The tribunal awarded £5,976.98 for that redundancy payment. It also recorded that the complaints of breach of contract relating to notice and unpaid holiday pay were brought after the statutory time limit had expired, and that it had been reasonably practicable for those claims to have been brought in time. Both of those complaints were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,976.98. | Upheld | — | £5,977 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint relating to notice pay. The tribunal found it was brought after the statutory time limit had expired and that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint relating to unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal found it was brought after the statutory time limit had expired and that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been brought in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,977
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.