Case 1400347/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. M. Pontes v Boyack Enterprises Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400347/2019
- Decision date
- 6 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R. Harper MBE
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. M. Pontes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim recorded was a claim for unpaid wages by Ms M. Pontes against Boyack Enterprises Limited. The case was heard in Bristol on 6 September 2019 before Employment Judge R. Harper MBE, with the claimant and respondent both represented.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unpaid wages claim because the claim had been filed out of time. It also found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time.
No merits determination or monetary remedy was recorded. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unpaid wages claim because it was filed out of time and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been filed in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.