Case 1400363/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Renz v Marks and Spencer plc — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400363/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Renz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 22 February 2021 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with tribunal orders dated 29 October 2020 and 3 February 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The orders required the claimant to provide information about the unfair dismissal and discrimination claims, a schedule of loss, a disability impact statement, and relevant medical records.
The claimant failed to provide the ordered information and failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing. The hearing listed for 2 March 2021 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claim was struck out after the claimant did not comply with tribunal orders, including an order to provide information relating to unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to discrimination claims requiring clarification and to an order for a disability impact statement and relevant medical records. It does not set out the pleaded discrimination claim in detail. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.