Case 1400407/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person v Mr Ian Westwood (Manager) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400407/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Street Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton by CVP on 3 December 2021, Employment Judge Street heard the Claimant, Mr Christopher Morris, appearing in person, and the Respondent, Hamble Catering Ltd, represented by Mr Ian Westwood (Manager). The tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £65.00.
The tribunal also allowed the Claimant's breach of contract claim and ordered £375 in damages, described as the gross sum due by way of damages for that breach. It further found that the Respondent had failed to give the Claimant a written statement of employment particulars and awarded £750, being an amount equal to two weeks' pay.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The total amount the Respondent was ordered to pay was £1,190.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross amount of £65.00. | Upheld | — | £65 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for damages for breach of contract succeeded and the tribunal ordered payment of £375 as the gross sum due by way of damages. | Upheld | — | £375 |
| Other | The Respondent failed to give the Claimant a written statement of employment particulars; the tribunal awarded an amount equal to two weeks' pay, assessed at £750. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,190
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.