Case 1400409/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Rowe v Ciaran McClennon Construction — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400409/2023
- Decision date
- 12 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Rowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 November 2023, the tribunal gave Mr T Rowe an opportunity to make written representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's case management orders and had not actively pursued the case.
Mr Rowe did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 11 January 2024 did not take place, and judgment was sent to the parties on 12 December 2023.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim in full; no separate reasoning was given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment struck out the claim in full; no separate reasoning was given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim in full; no separate reasoning was given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim in full; no separate reasoning was given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim in full; no separate reasoning was given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.