Case 1400413/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shannon Vieira v AND Anthony Grimes and Kelly Grimes (trading as All Seasons Cleaning Solutions) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400413/2023
- Decision date
- 29 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shannon Vieira
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in chambers at Plymouth on 9 August 2023. The time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented, so judgment was entered under Rule 21 in favour of Miss Shannon Vieira against Anthony Grimes and Kelly Grimes trading as All Seasons Cleaning Solutions.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded in respect of salary for November 2022, CITB course expenses, and pension payments. The judgment records those items as £680.40, £99.00, and £11.50 respectively, and orders the respondents to pay the claimant a gross sum of £791.15.
The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondents to pay 79 hours' pay in the gross sum of £770.00. No separate breakdown of award components beyond the two gross sums appears in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21. The claim succeeded in respect of salary for November 2022 (£680.40), CITB course expenses (£99.00), and pension payments (£11.50). The order states a gross sum of £791.15, although those listed component amounts total £790.90 in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £791 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of 79 hours' pay in the gross sum of £770.00. | Upheld | — | £770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,561
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.