Case 1400420/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bayo v Osprey Europe Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400420/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bayo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 26 June 2024 it had given Mr M Bayo an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment states that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations why strike out should not occur, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Livesey struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract, whistleblowing, or unfair dismissal issues, and it does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the extracted text, but Layer 1 records breach of contract as one of the listed claim categories for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the extracted text, but Layer 1 records public interest disclosure as one of the listed claim categories for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the extracted text, but Layer 1 records unfair dismissal as one of the listed claim categories for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.