Case 1400425/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JH Currie v Future Communication Specialists Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400425/2019
- Decision date
- 15 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JH Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a rule 37 strike-out judgment in Mr JH Currie v Future Communication Specialists Limited. By letter dated 27 June 2019, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 19 June 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the response on 12 July 2019.
The judgment states that the respondent remained entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but could only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment does not record any substantive merits determination or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the respondent's response under rule 37 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 19 June 2019 and because the response had not been actively pursued. No substantive determination of the underlying claims is recorded in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.