Case 1400425/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Simpson v Awaken Intelligence Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400425/2021
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 March 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs Simpson an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. A further letter dated 27 April 2021 gave her a second opportunity to respond.
No representations or response were received. The tribunal therefore found that the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim and ordered that it be struck out. The judgment records the decision as sent to the parties on 2 July 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.