Case 1400430/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Drimusch and v Mrs B Holland trading as the Angel and Station Restaurant — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400430/2019
- Decision date
- 15 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Drimusch and
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided in chambers at Plymouth on 11 April 2019 under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant, Mr T Drimusch, had been discriminated against on the grounds of race.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of race. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded under Rule 21. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded under Rule 21. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.