Case 1400431/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Driscoll-Bennett v Lordrite Wooden Floors Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400431/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Representation
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Driscoll-Bennett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Southampton on 3 October 2019, Employment Judge Craft recorded that Mr N Driscoll-Bennett had been employed by Lordrite Wooden Floors Ltd from 22 September 2011 until his resignation from his role as Sales Director on 12 February 2019. The decision records the parties and the history relied on for jurisdiction, but does not set out any factual findings on liability beyond that employment period.
The tribunal stated that it had jurisdiction to consider the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal. No substantive determination of the unfair dismissal claim, and no remedy assessment, appears in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, but the supplied judgment does not record any merits determination or remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.