Case 1400434/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Davis v Waterfront Cars Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400434/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent presented no response to the claim. The Employment Judge determined the case on the information in the claim form and the claimant’s email of 21 March 2020.
The tribunal found that Mr S Davis was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Waterfront Cars Ltd to pay damages to him in the net sum of £1,937.00.
The tribunal also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,150.00 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. The combined monetary total of the judgment was £5,087.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £1,937.00. | Upheld | — | £1,937 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,150.00. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,087
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.