Case 1400440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Walker v Elcock Associates Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400440/2021
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms Goddard, Mr Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Bristol before Employment Judge Halliday with Ms Goddard and Mr Richardson, heard the case remotely on 25 May 2022. It allowed the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered Elcock Associates Limited to pay £174.74.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's sexual orientation discrimination complaint, described in the judgment as victimisation. That claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £175 |
| Victimisation | The judgment records this as 'sexual orientation discrimination (victimisation)' and dismisses it as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £175
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.