Case 1400443/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400443/2021
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting in chambers at Plymouth on 3 September 2021 before Employment Judge N J Roper, determined the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that Ms Amanda Browning was not an employee of Dorset Council. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The judgment states that this dismissal did not affect the claimant's remaining claims of detriment arising under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which were said to be addressed in the attached Case Management Summary. Those remaining claims were not determined in this judgment. No monetary remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee of the respondent, so the claim for unfair dismissal under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.