Case 1400445/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bearman v NG Bailey Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400445/2023
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barton Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bearman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Barton. The tribunal held that the Claimant was not a disabled person by reason of dyslexia at the times material to the claim. On that basis, the disability claim relating to that asserted disability was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the Claimant's detriment claims numbered 1-8, 10 and 11, together with the reasonable adjustment claims, because they were out of time. No remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found that the Claimant was not a disabled person by reason of dyslexia at the times material to the claim, so this disability claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Claimant's detriment claims (1-8, 10 and 11) and reasonable adjustment claims were dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.