Case 1400454/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brewer v Meshii Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1400454/2024
- Decision date
- 12 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brewer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr A Brewer’s claim for accrued but untaken holiday was well founded and ordered Meshii Group Limited to pay £4,307.68 gross. It also found that the claim for the balance of notice pay was well founded and ordered payment of £10,258.90 net.
The tribunal further found that the respondent did not comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. It considered it just and equitable to apply a 10% uplift to the holiday and notice pay awards, producing an additional £1,456.66 and a total amount payable of £16,023.24.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday was well founded. The tribunal ordered £4,307.68 gross before the 10% ACAS uplift, which was applied to the holiday and notice awards together and was not split per claim. | Upheld | — | £4,308 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for the balance of notice pay was well founded. The tribunal ordered £10,258.90 net before the 10% ACAS uplift, which was applied to the holiday and notice awards together and was not split per claim. | Upheld | — | £10,259 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,023
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.