Case 1400460/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Wright v Serco Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400460/2018
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Members
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr J Shah, Mr L Wakeman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded a unanimous judgment following a hearing at Southampton on 12 November 2019. The Claimant's claims of race discrimination and unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed on withdrawal.
The Tribunal also found that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed and was not wrongfully dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written judgment did not set out further factual findings or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deductions from wages claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was not wrongfully dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.