Case 1400462/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1400462/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
- Venue
- Exeter
- Panel members
- Ms R Hewitt-Gray, Mr I Ley
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 14 December 2020 before Employment Judge Smail, sitting with Ms R Hewitt-Gray and Mr I Ley, the Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr R. Clement, Counsel. After the Tribunal checked multiple times that the Claimant still wished to withdraw her claim, it made a judgment dismissing the claims upon withdrawal.
The Tribunal made no order as to costs. The extracted judgment does not record any separate liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim upon withdrawal after the Tribunal checked multiple times that the Claimant wished to withdraw it. The judgment does not break out a separate head-by-head outcome. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claims upon withdrawal after the Tribunal checked multiple times that the Claimant wished to withdraw. The judgment does not break out a separate head-by-head outcome. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claims upon withdrawal after the Tribunal checked multiple times that the Claimant wished to withdraw. The judgment does not break out a separate head-by-head outcome. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.