Case 1400470/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Luther v Clearcom Analytics Limited Heard by Cloud Video Platform — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400470/2020
- Decision date
- 3 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Luther
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 3 June 2020 by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge Dawson, with the respondent not attending. The tribunal recorded that Mr P Luther had been dismissed by reason of redundancy on 24 January 2020 and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,953.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 24 January 2020 and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,953. | Upheld | — | £9,953 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £12,839.99 gross/net. | Upheld | — | £12,840 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £8,160.36 damages. | Upheld | — | £8,160 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £250.40. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,204
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.