Case 1400479/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Munn v NHS Professionals Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400479/2024
- Decision date
- 3 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Munn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held at Bristol on 3 June 2025, Employment Judge Livesey ruled on part of the claimant's whistleblowing detriment case under section 47B of the Employment Rights Act. The tribunal held that the complaints identified in paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.1.6 of the List of Issues had no reasonable prospects of success.
Those complaints were dismissed under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment expressly states that the remainder of the claim was not disposed of and would continue in accordance with an order and case summary made the same day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claimant's detriment complaints under s.47B ERA identified at paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.1.6 of the List of Issues for having no reasonable prospects of success under rule 38. The remainder of the claim was ordered to proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claimant's detriment complaints under s.47B ERA identified at paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.1.6 of the List of Issues for having no reasonable prospects of success under rule 38. The remainder of the claim was ordered to proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claimant's detriment complaints under s.47B ERA identified at paragraphs 3.1.1, 3.1.3 and 3.1.6 of the List of Issues for having no reasonable prospects of success under rule 38. The remainder of the claim was ordered to proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s. 47B Employment Rights Act
- rule 38 Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.