Case 1400485/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Matthew Dellapia v D&J Hussey T/A The Black Horse — 2022
- Case reference
- 1400485/2022
- Decision date
- 26 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
- Venue
- Bristol ET via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Matthew Dellapia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol Employment Tribunal hearing on 21 October 2022, before Employment Judge G. King, the claimant did not attend and the respondent attended through Mr D. Hussey. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant’s claim for unlawful deductions from wages, again finding that it was not well founded. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the claim for unpaid holiday pay was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.