Mr G Probert (Counsel) For the v Cpm — 2022

Case reference: 1400488/2021
Decision date: 22 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gray Dated

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr G Probert (Counsel) For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing. After considering the available information, the tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.

The tribunal determined the preliminary issue before it and found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the times material to the claim, by reason of anxiety and depression. The judgment did not determine liability on the substantive claims or make any remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The tribunal determined only the preliminary issue that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the material times by reason of anxiety and depression. It did not determine the merits of any discrimination, unfair dismissal, victimisation, or other substantive claim in this judgment.	Other	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.