Case 1400492/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Meandmyprotection Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400492/2019
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hargrove
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Walters succeeded on his claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found sums were due for unpaid wages for October 2018 and 1-2 November 2018, accrued holiday pay, and commission due after a 10% clawback deduction. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,575.13, £332.77 and £675 respectively.
He also succeeded on his breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunal Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,109.23 as the balance of notice pay due and £723.34 as travelling expenses due. The judgment records that the respondent did not attend or appear, although written submissions were received and considered.
The awards total £4,415.47. No separate award for basic compensation, compensatory loss, injury to feelings, or interest is recorded in the judgment, and the decision is confined to the monetary sums listed above.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeding in respect of unpaid wages for October 2018 and 1-2 November 2018, accrued holiday pay, and commission due after a 10% clawback deduction. | Upheld | — | £2,583 |
| Breach of contract | Succeeding in respect of balance of notice pay and travelling expenses due under the Employment Tribunal Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order. | Upheld | — | £1,833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,415
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunal Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.