Case 1400503/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Concept Security Solutions Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400503/2024
- Decision date
- 22 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant was employed by the Respondent between 6 June 2021 and 28 October 2023, when he was summarily dismissed. The period of employment included a suspension between 1 August 2023 and 14 October 2023 during which the Claimant's SIA licence was suspended. The tribunal found the summary dismissal on 28 October 2023 was an unfair dismissal.
For the holiday year 1 January 2023 to 28 October 2023, the Claimant had accrued 23.3 days of untaken and unpaid holiday, working 15-hour shifts at £10.75 per hour, resulting in holiday pay owed of £3,757.12. For the unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,286 (2 years x statutory cap of £643 weekly pay) and loss of earnings of £11,452.96 net covering the period from dismissal to the Respondent entering voluntary liquidation on 28 February 2024.
The Respondent did not appear at the hearing, which was held at Exeter by CVP on 7 March 2025 before Employment Judge Smail. The total sum the Respondent must pay to the Claimant is £16,496.08.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £1,286 (2 years x statutory cap of £643 weekly pay) plus loss of earnings of £11,452.96 net (4 x net monthly earnings of £2,863.24) covering the period from summary dismissal on 28 October 2023 to the Respondent's voluntary liquidation on 28 February 2024. | Upheld | — | £12,739 |
| Holiday pay | 23.3 days accrued, untaken and unpaid holiday for the holiday year 1 January 2023 to 28 October 2023, calculated as 23.3 x 15 hour shifts x £10.75 per hour. | Upheld | — | £3,757 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,496
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,286
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,453
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.