Case 1400505/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Melanie Waterhouse v Peters Dean Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1400505/2024
- Decision date
- 7 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Melanie Waterhouse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Melanie Waterhouse brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Peters Dean Care Limited. Employment Judge Hay heard the case at Bristol Employment Tribunal via CVP on 19 and 20 June 2025.
The tribunal held that the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written decision does not set out the tribunal's reasoning in full; it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The decision also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or by written request within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written record states that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are included in the decision record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.