Case 1400508/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Albusel v Abdul Mannan T/A Montpellier Bar and Grill — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400508/2019
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Albusel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Bristol hearing on 4 October 2019, before Employment Judge Midgley, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that Miss M Albusel’s claim for unlawful deduction of wages contrary to s.13 ERA 1996 was well founded and succeeded. It also held that her claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to s.38 EA 2002 was well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal further held that the claimant had suffered unlawful discrimination contrary to s.18 EqA 2010 because of pregnancy, and that claim also succeeded. The judgment does not set out written reasons beyond recording that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered £332.90 for the unlawful deductions from wages and £960.00, representing 4 weeks' pay, for the failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. It also ordered £9,000 for injury to feelings in respect of the pregnancy discrimination claim, together with interest on that injury to feelings award of £609.53.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded under s.13 ERA 1996; the respondent was ordered to pay £332.90. | Upheld | — | £333 |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under s.38 EA 2002; the tribunal ordered 4 weeks' pay of £960.00. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim succeeded under s.18 EqA 2010 because of pregnancy; the tribunal awarded £9,000 for injury to feelings and interest separately. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £9,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,902
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.38 EA 2002
- s.18 EqA 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.