Case 1400512/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Wezowicz C1 Mr K Markowski C2 Mr P Blazejewski C3 Mr K Smykowski C4 v Polyclear Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1400512/2018
- Decision date
- 14 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Wezowicz C1 Mr K Markowski C2 Mr P Blazejewski C3 Mr K Smykowski C4
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Dawson on 1 October 2021. The parties agreed that, because the unless order made on 14 January 2019 had been set aside, the claims were no longer undefended.
On that basis, the tribunal revoked the judgment of Employment Judge Craft that had been sent to the parties on 14 November 2019. The record states that the judgment was revoked by consent.
The tribunal noted that a trial on the merits would now be necessary before remedy could be considered. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This preliminary hearing did not determine the substantive claims. The tribunal revoked the earlier judgment of Employment Judge Craft by consent after the unless order of 14 January 2019 had been set aside, and recorded that a trial on the merits was still required before remedy could be considered. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 72(3) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.