Case 1400512/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Moore v Smart Deep Clean Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1400512/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Moore brought a claim against Smart Deep Clean Services Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages. The respondent did not attend or provide representation at the hearing on 13 January 2023 before Employment Judge Leith in Bristol via CVP.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay wages due for October, November and December 2021, during a period when the claimant was paid monthly in arrears on or around the 15th of the following month. It also found that the respondent had not paid for annual leave accrued but untaken on termination of employment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,500.90. That total comprised £285 for October 2021, £638.87 for November 2021, £294.40 for December 2021, and £282.63 for 3.5 days of accrued but untaken annual leave at £80.75 per day. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,501
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.