Case 1400521/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wyatt v Airways Optical Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1400521/2020
- Decision date
- 5 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wyatt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short rule 52 withdrawal disposal in case 1400521/2020 between Mr S Wyatt and Airways Optical Limited. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No findings on liability, no substantive reasons, and no monetary award or remedy breakdown are set out in the text. The case listing categories supplied for the file were contract of employment and unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not identify the individual claims separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.